HOME
ABOUT SPACE EXPLORATION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS
THIS SITE IS MAINTAINED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING ADVERTISMENTS!
THE ENTIRE LIST OF PUBLISHED ARTICLES AND NEWSLETTERS CAN BE ACCESSED ON
ABOUT SPACE EXPLORATION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS
- FAKING THE SCIENCE FOR PUPILS - PART VI
Some circumstantial facts ,,forced” me to write about a topic I was musing for long time, but it was postponed all the time for an indefinite future.
The topic in discussion is about latest pristine part of our planet Earth - the upper atmosphere - and how humanity can have a sustainable space exploration industry.
The aerospace industry is expanding rapidly toward a permanent presence of human factor in outer space and from my point of view, it is of paramount importance for the scientific community not only to assess the negative impact of this industry for the upper atmosphere, but to support precautionary measures and to advance some new innovative solutions too.
The first section entitled space exploration and the wild capitalism analysis the ,,hidden“ face of aerospace industry and its impact on atmosphere.
The chemistry of upper atmosphere is relatively stable and it makes no sense to destabilize it in order to spend other money in the future to fix it. I have serious doubts that aerospace industry is ever going to fix the damages they produce by burning the dirty chemicals used these days.
Not only dirty chemicals, but even water, the most ubiquitous substance on Earth is a plague for the upper atmosphere.
A wild uncontrolled and unregulated space exploration can generate in less than a decade bigger negative effects for life on Earth as a century of fossil fuels burning.
The second section advances some new solutions in order to have a sustainable space exploration.
If aerospace industry wants to continue with a chemical type of propulsion, a switch to a nitrogen based fuel has to be mandatory. Such nitrogen based fuel, used in the right way, would have minimal or no impact on atmosphere and especially on upper atmosphere.
Or maybe the space tourists cannot afford a few hundreds bucks more for a cleaner fuel?
Other technologies for escaping atmosphere are discussed too.
The StarTram project was already proposed by others as a space launch system propelled by maglev technology using the slope of a mountain. A sustainable space exploration has to support such initiative to be implemented as soon as possible and not consider it only a theoretical possibility.
In my opinion such a system should be cheaper and easier to be assembled on a platform in the upper atmosphere. First of all in order to have a platform in the upper atmosphere, it is necessary to support this platform by flotation and helium or hydrogen balloons are the only options possible.
By default hydrogen is scary because it entered in the public subconscious after the Hindenburg disaster. At 40 km in the upper atmosphere, the oxygen is so scarce that a simple burning of hydrogen would take place with difficulty, if any; to have an explosion there is out of question.
In order to carry the launching package up to the upper atmosphere platform, helium balloons can be used as far they are safer for ascending and descending through troposphere and stratosphere.
There is also necessary to develop some more reusable balloons for ascension or descent and such a prototype of a two compartment balloon is described too.
The third section discus about rocket boosters and how these can be improved.
The present chemicals used in these boosters are ecological bombs and have a strong effect on stratosphere and on ozone layer.
Here there is an option of choice to switch to other cleaner chemicals or to promote a complete new technology.
The forth section changes completely the topic and presents an introductory discussion about the absurdities of classical quantum theory; classical because it relates to atomic structure and not to the other fields.
Well, I think that this section is going to become the nightmare of quantum fanatics because a simple analogy with pi irrational number is going to demolish the entire foundation of this theory.
Not one, not two, not three, but four paradoxes are presented here.
The first paradox of QM: a quanta of energy has a variable size, but a a quanta of momentum (angular, spin, possible linear) has always a constant value.
The second quantum paradox: the quantified motion of a particle around a center of force (in our case electron) cannot be a continuous curve.
There is a third paradox of quantum mechanics too:
-
for an electron on orbit, the angular momentum is quantified and its energy is non-quantified.
-
during a quantum jump, the energy becomes quantified and the momentum non-quantified.
The strange variation of angular momentum during a quantum jump represents the forth paradox of quantum mechanics.
After this introduction, there are going to be other articles about the topic soon....
It is a pity that no one in the entire world has considered necessary to support the development of this theory.
A famous dictator once said: A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.
My struggle (and survival) with an imbecile gang of intellectual criminals is a personal tragedy. The fact that decades of generations of youngsters have received a wrong and futile education is going to be only a statistic.
The only question to be answered now is: up to what moment the society can afford such large scale experiment?
And who is going to be considered guilty?
The amplitude and the extent of the disaster is going to be ,,quantified” when the balance changes.
And does someone thinks that an overnight change is going to solve the situation?
The last section is a copy carbon from the previous newsletter (Old game, same scene, new actors and figureheads….), because it is important for people to get in touch with the expected unexpected...
The entire article can be found here:
https://www.pleistoros.com/en/newsletters